Creche Inspection Reports

Ardilea Childcare Limited

Sessional · 1 - 6 Years · Dublin 14, Dublin · Tusla ID TU2024DS002 · Registered since 16 July 2024

An inspection records what inspectors saw on one day; services respond with corrective actions — how to read this.

3published inspections
3non-compliances at latest report read
0immediate action notices
0registration conditions

Inspection of 31 March 2026 — Inspection Report

Full report (PDF, Tusla)

Regulation 15 — Record of pre-school child

  • Four of the ten child records under review did not contain the complete set of required information and were missing one or more of the following: (b) The date on which the child first attended the service. (e) Authorisation for the collection of the child. (g) The name and telephone number of the child's medical practitioner. (h) Record of immunisations, if any, received by the child. (i) Written consent for appropriate medical treatment of the child in the event of an emergency
Provider's corrective action:
  • The registered provider stated that the start dates were inserted on the child records, and parents filled in the authorisation for collection and medical practitioners’ details as requested. Parents also provided an immunisation certificate and provided written consent for appropriate medical treatment required for the child in case of an emergency. Record forms were checked and updated accordingly

Regulation 16 — Record in Relation to a Pre-School Service

  • (2) (a)(b) Two written references were not sought or verified as required. (3) It is acknowledged that the documentation specified in 9(2)(a) and (b) above was received and verified for four adults prior to the adults commencing in the service. However, two written references were not sought or verified for one adult prior to the adult commencing in the service, as required. Allowing adults work with children before their suitability is established may result in individuals who are not appropriate having access to children
Provider's corrective action:
  • The registered provider stated that: • Two handwritten references were sought and verified by management and the student has since left the service. • The manager will be responsible to ensure that all students on training will only start after the relevant references are verified

Regulation 23 — Safeguarding health, safety and welfare of child

  • Administration of Medication: 1. The procedures in the service’s medication policy were not followed in relation to a specific medication held by the service for one child. The medication was not labelled with the child’s name and there was no written record of instructions on dosage or parental consent to administer the medication in the event of the child requiring it. A risk of harm to children is posed if medication is administered incorrectly. Action submitted by the Registered Provider
Provider's corrective action:
  • Administration of Medication: The registered provider stated that the medication bottle was removed from the service immediately and that the medication policy was updated to include the creation of a form for written parental consent for when long term medication needs to be administered to a child

Found compliant: Regulation 11, 16, 19.

Inspection of 25 November 2024 — Inspection Report

Full report (PDF, Tusla)

Regulation 9 — Management and recruitment

  • One of the references obtained in respect of one staff member from a source other than a past employer was not suitable, as the source of the reference could not be considered to be independent or unbiased
  • The registered provider did not ensure that a police vetting disclosure was obtained for one adult prior to them commencing work in the service. The staff member commenced working in the service on 25 September 2024 and the police vetting available for the staff member was dated 25 November 2024
Provider's corrective action:
  • The reference of one staff member needed to be from a source that was suitable and it has been rectified. The Manager will be more vigilant in the recruitment process and take advice from the HR company and the County Childcare Committee
  • The staff member did have a police vetting deemed unsuitable; thus, the new police vetting has been made available. The Manager will be more vigilant in the recruitment process and take advice from the HR company and the County Childcare Committee

Found compliant: Regulation 11, 19.

Inspection of 3 July 2024 — New Service

Full report (PDF, Tusla)

No non-compliance recorded in this report.

Other services in Dublin

Alert me when a new report is published · Dated report on this service — €19